Soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) listen to a briefing in preparation for a search and extraction exchange during the 13th annual U.S.-China Disaster Management Exchange at Camp Rilea Armed Forces Training Center, November 17, 2017, in Warrenton, Ore. U.S. Army Pacific hosts the annual exchange with the PLA to foster mutual trust and understanding while sharing lessons learned to increase disaster response capabilities in the Pacific region. (Photo by Sgt. 1st Class April Davis, Oregon Military Department Public Affairs)
Soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army. Photo: Sgt. 1st Class April Davis/US National Guard

China’s military is sounding the alarm over a growing artificial intelligence (AI) problem: systems that tell users what they want to hear instead of what is actually true.

In a recent article published by Beijing’s military newspaper PLA Daily, analysts warned that so-called “AI sycophancy” could become a serious risk as the People’s Liberation Army expands its use of artificial intelligence for command, intelligence analysis, and war simulations.

‘Implicit Misguidance’

The issue occurs when AI models prioritize user alignment over factual accuracy, effectively trapping users in “information cocoons” where existing assumptions are reinforced and contradictory data is filtered out.

Military researchers said the risk goes beyond routine chatbot errors.

If commanders receive AI-generated assessments that confirm their expectations rather than challenge them, it could lead to flawed decision-making, battlefield losses, and unintended civilian harm.

The article also warned that excessive trust in AI recommendations could weaken human oversight, making it harder for military leaders to spot errors or question misleading conclusions.

“This implicit misguidance, disguised as ‘compliance,’ can silently erode commanders’ independent judgment capabilities and strategic resolve, constituting a cognitive ‘soft kill’ weapon,” the authors wrote.

To reduce the risk, PLA Daily called for stricter testing protocols, mandatory human review, adversarial simulations, and cross-checking AI outputs across multiple systems before deployment.

China views AI as a critical area of military competition, but continues to maintain that humans, not algorithms, must make the final call on the battlefield, according to the South China Morning Post.

You May Also Like

New US Air Force Strategy Ties AI and Data to Faster Battlefield Decisions

Framework pushes enterprise-wide data access, governance, and AI integration across missions.

Leidos Partners With Rune on Military AI Logistics for Indo-Pacific

Leidos and Rune are combining predictive logistics and AI decision support to improve sustainment planning across complex Indo-Pacific military operations.

OpenAI CEO: Tech Firms Can’t Control How Military Uses AI

Operational decisions ultimately fall under the authority of the military chain of command, Altman said.